Idolatry
Exodus 20:4-5:
You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God... - NKJV
You must not make for yourself an idol of any kind or an image of anything in the heavens or on the earth or in the sea. You must not bow down to them or worship them, for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God who will not tolerate your affection for any other gods. - NLT
Thus reads the second commandment, behind only the order to place no other god above the one true God.
It's important enough to be second place, and yet it remains one of the most misunderstood of the commandments. Think to yourself of what idolatry means to you. You can even look it up in the dictionary if you want. For many, especially when they think of it within the context of the Ten Commandments, it means golden calves. It means little statuettes. It means remote caverns filled with sparklies. All of these things are certainly examples of idols, but they don't come anywhere near encompassing the idea of idolatry.
Idolatry is all around. Most of the people I know have at least some lesser idols. In fact, I live in a city whose economy thrives on idolatry. That city, for those of you who don't already know, is Iowa City, Iowa, home of the Hawkeye football team. If a cataclysm were to occur here that buried this city but left it mostly intact, archaeologists and paleontologists digging us up two thousand years from now would surmise that the indigenous population worshiped the eye of a hawk... and they'd be absolutely correct, in a manner of speaking. Shrines to the Hawkeyes are everywhere. Entire sections of many stores are devoted to them. When their underage members are caught drinking, it's referred to as "an unfortunate mistake" instead of what it's called when "normal" underage kids drink: a crime. Saying negative things about the Hawkeyes in this town, regardless of veracity, is treated as blasphemy and could result in negative consequences (meaning that I probably shouldn't have pointed out that they're crooks since I haven't done much to hide my identity, but I've decided to make a stand against letting religious fanatics terrorize me). The highest paid staff member of all the University of Iowa is not a heart or brain surgeon that will save lives; it is not a professor that will enlighten and empower hundreds if not thousands of people; it is the head coach of the Hawkeye football team. Hawkeye-ism has every single hallmark of a religion. All it lacks is the label. The Hawkeyes are a modern day idol with tens of thousands of worshipers. And yet, probably none of these worshipers consider themselves so. Tell any random one of them that they are worshiping a bunch of kids playing a game and they'll be confused, think you're confused, and/or deny it outright. Of course, none of that denial will change the truth of what they're doing.
Take that nugget and look around you. How much idolatry do you know of? How many plain, ordinary things do you see people worshiping daily? The negativism of idolatry has never been in the object being worshiped: it has always been in the importance people place upon it. Do I have something against Hawkeye football? No. Do I have something against money? No. Do I have something against people being famous? No. The list could go on for a while, but I hope you get the idea. What I have a problem with is the negative side effects of worshiping some stupid little thing. Anti-religion people are quick to point out all the times that religious fanatics have caused problems, but does any of that, even for a moment, diminish the negative effects of an idolatrous fanatic? If a self-proclaimed Christian beats up someone for being gay, is that significantly different from a Hawkeye fan beating up a Cyclone fan for worshiping the "wrong" colors? These are both examples of idolatry and its ramifications. And yet, one is (rightly) labelled a hate crime and gets national coverage, while the other doesn't even get mentioned in the local paper.
No matter how many examples of idolatry provided by both the religious and secular worlds, people continue falling into its traps. People are seduced by money, power, fame, food, even their standings in the local bowling leagues. Whether you believe in God or not, I think recognizing the very real dangers of idolatry is a benefit for everyone.
Idolatry
I don't think true idolatry is what you're talking about there. Making idols as children is not true idolatry because you're just making stuff and you know it's just stuff. Even if that stuff has/had a fond place in your heart, it's still probably not idolatry. The rug/picture example is absolutely not idolatry, because you did not actually fear the rug or worship the picture in your heart.
I don't think that what you're seeing as a developmental stage is really idolatry. I think it is using the non-real to simulate the real in preparation for dealing with the real. In other words, it's playing. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact, I think trying to shield a kid from doing those things would be really damaging.
True idolatry is harmful, not helpful. Again, while I'm certainly always going to talk about it from my religious angle, it is in no way restricted to religion.
Idolatry
I agree, true idolatry is harmful; and maybe you're right that the childhood example isn't accurate. I guess I was thinking of it as something which some people never are able to grow out of. But, no, I didn't mean to imply that I would ever try to shield a kid from doing that sort of play.
But don't you think it is about people's inability to deal with moral uncertainty and mortality?
So we're still kids...
"I guess I was thinking of it as something which some people never are able to grow out of. [...] But don't you think it is about people's inability to deal with moral uncertainty and mortality?" -- jaz
Sometimes, you need this kind of remark for you to realize the obvious: we're still kids. We still fear the same ole things our ancestors in the caves --if you believe that was the case-- did. So... where's all that "progress" we humans are supposed to have achieved? Huh?
Anyway, wouldn't that be true about religions, too? What's the difference? One man's religion is another man's idolatry, in my opinion...
re: So we're still kids...
You guys make me think and I love it. I've had to really process all this.
I think people need something to focus on. Idols and religions can fill that need. One might obsess over baseball statistics while another fantasizes about Star Wars (NSFW). Sure, some idols are used to address or allay fears, but that is a subset.
I don't really see any religion itself as being an idol. It comes down to the individual who follows it. Some people only go to church to put on a show. Some people go to church because they're afraid not to. It would be hard to call either idolatry.
Something to focus on
That's the point. The nature of the aforesaid something is different depending on the individual, and says much more about the individual itself than about the something.
Some people may be happy "shielding" themselves behind baseball, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings or LOST. Some other people may need to "shield" themselves behind something more spiritual. But, all in all, we're talking shields here. Things we put between ourselves and reality, responsibility, mistery or whatever may cause us distress.
I don't know, maybe I'm "shielding" myself behind an "atheism-steel wall"...
re: Something to focus on
I'm not completely disagreeing with the shielding aspect, I just think that to consider all idols as shields is an overstatement of the "all cats are mammals therefore all mammals are cats" variety.
For instance, your viewpoint would describe my Christianity as my idol. If that's the case, then what is it shielding me from? Being a Christian is something I can be, will be, and am persecuted for, so it's not protecting me from that. I know perfectly well that bad things are just as likely to happen to Christians as anyone else, so I don't expect it to shield me from calamity. Christianity has taught me to face all my responsibilities and challenges head-on, so it's certainly not something I can retreat into as a shield from everyday life. It's not even a shield from going to hell, as being saved is what prevents that, not the Christian religion. So, if Christianity and Christ are my idols, what are they shielding me from?
Ok, maybe *you* don't need a shield :-)
I don't deal with absolutes, my friend. But I'm guessing I'm not making myself clear.
I don't think baseball would protect anyone from the miseries of life. But some people may find relief in baseball because it distracts them from the nasty pieces of their life. "Yeah, my job sucks, but hey, my team is on a winning streak! Yay!" That kind of things.
Religions may do the same trick, even on a broader field. "Yeah, there's war, and hunger, and sickness... but God loves us all. Yay!" Of course, I'm oversimplifying.
Maybe the word "shield" was a poor choice. Maybe the word "cushion" is a better one: life still hits us hard, but its blows are somehow softened by our little "relievers".
Anyway, I don't think "religions" = "idols", it just doesn't make sense to me. egami said and "idol" is something we place before God. As I'm an atheist --as you already know-- I can't think of putting anything before nothing... 
So idolatry = obsession
re: So idolatry = obsession
People don't necessarily love their idols either. Some feel enslaved by them. Some song going around a few years ago had the lyric, "You're a slave to the money, then you die." (too lazy to look up the reference). I think idolatry could be considered a superset of obsession, in that all obsessions involve idolatry but not all idols are obsessions.
One instance of idolatry I see that is definitely not an obsession is the way some people treat printed matter. For some people, if they read it in a book or a newspaper or on a website, then they feel it must be true because "they" wouldn't let a person print falsity as fact, would "they"? The idea of any "authors" being "authoritative" on any given subject that person chooses to write about has led to an idolization of sorts of these writers.
eh... I guess I disagree
I completely define idolatry as obsession - whether that obsession is directly tied to the subject matter of the obsessive behavior or not.
Where I would be mincing words here would be on how I define "obsession". Aptly summed up by wordnet: "an unhealthy and compulsive preoccupation with something or someone ".
Dictionary.com
| 1. | the domination of one's thoughts or feelings by a persistent idea, image, desire, etc. |
| 2. | the idea, image, desire, feeling, etc., itself. |
| 3. | the state of being obsessed. |
| 4. | the act of obsessing. |
So - obsession is not just the act of obsessing or the subject of that obsession - the definition includes both and could be used interchangeably with the terms idolatry and idol, given the sentence structure.
The example you give about printed matter actually does classify as an obsession (and idolatry) to me as I use the terms. The debate about what part of that scenario is the idol itself is completely subjective and dependent upon the obsessive's reason for engaging in that behavior. In any matter - this type of behavior - whatever the idol is in this scenario is definitely "unhealthy" and thus obsessive.
There could be further distinction made on different types of idolatry, it's true ... that the idolization that has a "direct payoff" is more often the type of idolatry that people "love" to engage in and thus don't feel "enslaved to" -- to me this subset would be equivalent to addiction. But that's more about what's feeding the obsession than what the idol is. It tells you how strong the delusion is that the person creates in order to indulge in their obsessive behavior because in the end - all obsession will have you enslaved.
Commenting from the peanut gallery...
That sounds like a fair comparision to me.
You guys make me think...
Copy that ESi...and I love it...and all of you.
I disagree with the video's contention, though, that memorizing the details of Star Wars isn't useful in one's life!
“fear is the path to the dark side. fear leads to anger. anger leads to hate. hate leads to suffering. ~ yoda”
I mean, who can't make use of that ?
Yoda
Simple Terms
In simple terms, to me idolatry is simply placing something before God...Paul wrote in Col 3:5 that covetousness is idolatry. I think when you want something more than God that becomes idolatry...historically engraven images are associated with the term, but I think if you study most religious representation of these images you'll find that they are almost always directly linked to sinful desires in their representation and that is completely disregarding the fact that the worship of them in and of itself is sinful in the eyes of the God.
I think in 1st Corinthians Paul warns Christians against this and reflects back on their past transgressions of this sin as an example...that passage coincidentally is talking primarily of sexual sin and making your physical body a temple for God. Which, to me, basically implies putting lusts of the flesh (not just sexual) ahead of your love for God.
moral uncertainty and mortality
It could be. I can see where idolatry could be stretched into the "Devil made me do it" argument. Idolizing an ideal falls well within the purview of idolatry. For some reason, I feel that what you're referring to is something different. I'm just drawing a blank right now on what it is. Something along the lines of "religion for religion's sake" or the "nobody lives forever so to hell with the consequences" mentalities.
Are you referring to things like guys who just never stop playing video games? Woops hold on there's a blue guy in my base. AFKFAS (/y i'm in yer base, killin yer d00dz!). I mean, err..., what?
Moral uncertainty and mortality
re: Moral uncertainty and mortality
I'm starting to see some overlap between the topic of idolatry and the topic of the Western individualistic narcissistic mindset in this discussion.
When a person sees himself as the most important thing going, then he envisions himself as being the god-figure, effectively idolizing himself. The things he surrounds himself with, whether it be persons, animals, or objects of his desire, become his "subjects" or "disciples" in his own mind. When those things are no longer sufficient, they are discarded.
Idolatry
"When a person sees himself as the most important thing going, then he envisions himself as being the god-figure, effectively idolizing himself. " - ESi
"American Idol" immediately popped in my head. Just the name itself represents society's definition of "idol" as something that is normal and approved of. I don't watch it but the concept of the show includes talented people competing for fame and pride where the public casts votes on who is the best singer - is it still idolatry if you are a viewer who doesn't "idolize" the show, but in some lesser form take pleasure in the simple act of watching? I think I'd say most definitely yes.
re: Idolatry
I think I'm with Jaz...
... in suggesting that idolatry and Western narcissism DO overlap. I mean… isn’t ALL sin inherently narcissistic?
I suppose, though, ESi, that's sorta what you're saying also... ![]()

Idolatry
I have to think that idolatry answers (if only inadequately) some basic human need. I actually remember a period of early childhood in which my friends and I created lots of idols and doing so seemed to be about trying to figure out things about ethics without our parents giving us blow by blow instructions--things like, "Well, today the living room rug is poison--nobody can touch it. If you touch it by accident, you have 10 seconds to bow down 5 times to that picture..."
So in that way I guess I see idolatry as a developmental stage in developing one's moral authority. And the need it seems to answer is our inability to take the leap of faith (in Kierkegaard's sense of the term) necessary to take the responsibility onto ourselves--looking for some permanent external representation for moral justification because we cannot deal with uncertainty. In that way I think it's also about our inability to deal with our own temporal nature and all that that implies, including mortality.